
How the States Forced Congress to Give Up Control of the Senate
By the early 1900s, the United States Senate had become a national embarrassment. Seats sat vacant for months—sometimes years—because state legislatures couldn’t agree on whom to appoint. Corporate interests, particularly railroad and mining magnates, openly bribed state legislators to install sympathetic senators, earning the chamber its notorious reputation as the “Millionaires’ Club.” And perhaps most perversely, state legislative races—meant to address local concerns—had been completely hijacked by national politics, with voters choosing their representatives based solely on which U.S. senator candidate they promised to support. This wasn’t what the Framers had envisioned when they wrote Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution in 1787, establishing that each state’s two senators would be “chosen by the Legislature thereof.” The system was designed to protect states’ rights and serve as a deliberate check against what the Founders feared as “popular passion.” But by the late 19th century, that elegant constitutional mechanism had collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions. The dysfunction reached its nadir in 1905, when Delaware’s legislature became so hopelessly gridlocked that the state went entirely unrepresented in the U.S. Senate. It wasn’t an isolated incident. Across the country, legislative deadlocks routinely left senate seats empty, depriving states of
How the States Forced Congress to Give Up Control of the Senate
Trump’s Soccer Magic Turns Toxic as USA Gets Embarrassed, 4-1
U.N. Chief Wants a Ban on Killer Robots
Born with a Silver Trump Account in Their Mouth
For a Fledgling Democracy, Early US Politics Had the Elite Choosing Our President

