News Vérité

The Trump administration is sending out $500 checks, or direct-deposit payments, to purchasers of Obamacare (or ACA, Affordable Care Act) policies during the Biden years. The stated rationale is that the Biden regime overcharged them. Some families with more than one “affected person” will receive multiple $500 checks or direct deposits. In all, close to one million individuals will receive the refund. All well and good until you look at some of the details. For instance, to qualify, you must have an income 400 percent higher than the poverty level, or about $63,000 a year. This may be due to those under that level not having been overcharged, but it seems a bit mysterious. The second mystery component is that the refunds are only going to states where ACA is administered directly by the federal government. Some states, primarily largely Democrat strongholds on both coasts, administer ACA signups themselves. They don’t qualify. In other words, these checks and direct deposits are going out to voters in the Great Middle America, where many states are either red or purple. Is this a vote-buying gambit? You get $500 now and $5,000 if you keep the GOP in charge of both houses.

President Trump gathered today with the nation’s top movers and shakers in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence (AI) industry. Afterwards, he joined them for an impromptu press conference on the White House driveway, where he attempted to drive home to the world what he views as the message of the confab — that these leaders had all agreed that they would be “morally” bound to ensure AI remains within guardrails to ensure its safety. At the same time, he announced that AI would no longer be called AI, but SI, or superintelligence. Now, whether this new terminology will stick remains to be seen, as most of what Trump announced outside the presidential palace seemed to fall on unbelieving ears. Even his gathered AI/SI executives seemed split on the direction Trump was pointing the industry toward: self-regulation. The reporters seemed universally skeptical. At one point, Trump did mention that a safety review committee of ten might be set up, but there was nothing definite about the announcement as to when or who might be involved. We’re still waiting for Trump’s appointment of an AI Czar, announced more than a week ago, though he hinted that the person he had in mind

When the money got going, Nick Saban got going — when the money got going to college athletes, that is. After the Supreme Court opened the floodgates for college athletes to be paid cash rather than just scholarships, University of Alabama football coach Nick Saban — accustomed to yearly national championships — saw the dollar signs on the chalkboard and decided to retire. There was no way a school in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, could compete donor-wise with its bigger northern rivals. Saban quickly bowed out, saying to this day that it had nothing to do with the increased competition. Even on ESPN this morning, he waffled about his reason for retiring when Stephen A. asked about it. Since his “retirement,” Saban has been busy trying to fix the money mess NCAA schools find themselves in, while he himself is enriching himself with lucrative TV deals. He even lobbied Congress for a fix, and in response, the Senate yesterday passed the Protect College Sports Act. Now, it goes to the House for approval. Here are the details of that bill: The legislation officially named the Protect College Sports Act (commonly referred to alongside “Save College Sports” efforts) passed the Senate in a

In an interview on NBC’s Meet the Press with Kristen Welker, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates raised severe warnings about the rapid advancement and misuse of artificial intelligence. The Threats Gates Identified Potential for Mass Casualties Gates warned about the severe threats posed by malicious actors wielding advanced technology, stating that “AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that cause a billion deaths.” Unprecedented Weaponization He emphasized how dangerous these tools are in the wrong hands, noting, “There’s never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools.” Inadequacy of Simple Controls Addressing simplified solutions to AI risk, Gates warned, “It’s not enough to have a kill switch.” Gates’s Recommendations Government Regulation Over Self-Regulation Gates argued that self-regulation by technology firms is insufficient. He called for government involvement and legal frameworks, stating that “AI legislation” is necessary. System Monitoring and Records Instead of relying solely on an emergency shutdown mechanism, Gates recommended implementing strict monitoring and tracking protocols so law enforcement and regulators can maintain visibility into AI operations. Bipartisan and Global Cooperation He urged political parties and lawmakers to work together quickly to establish safety frameworks and safeguards to keep